National Security & Science: Tesla, Einstein & Zero Point Energy

The possible science behind Die Glocke and how it could have been developed.


If indeed this Bell that the Nazis were developing was "war decisive," then one would think the science behind it would also be revolutionary.  We shall try to trace the history of the technology behind the Bell.  This will take time to explain since some background must be given long before Hitler's rise to power. (We warn our readers ahead of time that this article is long and focused.  We recommend that you watch all the videos as they will fill in information that may not be fully explained in the text portion.)

See These Pages: FUTURISM TECH TRENDS SINGULARITY SCIENCE CENSORSHIP SOCIAL NETWORKS eREADERS MOBILE DEVICES


Nikola Tesla & Einstein
It is hard to say enough things about Nikola Tesla.  We have spoken about him before in this blog.  We include a film titled, The Secret of Nikola Tesla that was done in 1980 starring Orson Welles as J.P. Morgan.  Since there are so few movies about Tesla, we include it for your perusal.  The movie would not be professional by our modern Hollywood editing standards but it is well worth watching!  If you cannot see the embedded video here is the link: http://bit.ly/oy4KhU.

"To understand Tesla, you must take seriously, I think, his suggestion that the present electromagnetic model is seriously flawed."
Tom Bearden


Although we do not agree with everything in this video, we think some of the information is very interesting.


Tesla and Einstein did not agree.  In 1887, one of the most important experiments in the history of Physics occurred in Cleveland, Ohio.  To many, this experiment conclusively proved that something called the luminiferous ether did not exist, which had been postulated for centuries in the world of physics.  The term luminiferous related to "light-bearing."  In other words, this was medium through which light moved, or so it was believed.  We will post here a series of videos to explain the Michelson-Morley Experiment for those who are bit rusty in their physics.  If you cannot see the embedded video, here is the link: http://bit.ly/o1Wd7L.

"...there is a weighty argument to be adduced in favour of the Aether hypothesis. To deny the Aether is ultimately to assume that empty space has no physical qualities whatever. The fundamental facts of mechanics do not harmonize with this view."
Albert Einstein
Aether and the Theory of Relativity
1920


It is interesting to note however, that both Morley and Einstein did not reject the existence of an ether, even after this experiment.  The Michelson-Morley experiment did not detect an ether, but this does not mean that an ether does not exist.  As late as 1927, in his book titled, Studies in Optics,  in the chapter on Effects of Motion Of the Medium on Velocity Of Light, accepted Einstein's theory of relativity, but explained, "...the existence of an ether appears to be inconsistent of a medium, either by modifying the theory, or, more probably by attributing the requisite properties fo the ether." Yet in that same year, at a conference on the Michelson-Morley experiment, held at the Mount Wilson Observatory Michelson states, ""talking in terms of my beloved old ether (which is not abandoned, though I personally still cling a little to it)..."  This explains why his daughter said that he believed it to the end of his life, even though he had accepted Einstein's theory.

If you are getting a bit confused about all these terms and you are really interested in refreshing your memory, we recommend this video from the BBC called Atom The Illusion of Reality.  If you cannot see the embedded video here is the link: http://youtu.be/64yJbVqtfsg.


Even Einstein did not reject the concept of an ether.  In 1924, Einstein published a paper titled, Concerning the Aether.  In it he stated,

Now, it might be claimed that this concept covers all objects of physics, for according to consistent field theory, even ponderable matter, or its constituent elementary particles, are to be understood as fields of some kind or particular ‘states of space’. But it must be admitted that such a view would be premature, since, thus far, all efforts directed toward this goal have foundered. So we are effectively forced by the current state of things to distinguish between matter and aether, even though we may hope that future generations will transcend this dualistic conception and replace it with a unified theory, as the field theoreticians of our day have tried in vain to accomplish.

He concluded the paper with this statement,

...we will not be able to do without the aether in theoretical physics, that is, a continuum endowed with physical properties; for general relativity, to whose fundamental viewpoints physicists will always hold fast, rules out direct action at a distance. But every theory of local action assumes continuous fields, and thus also the existence of an ‘aether’.

Tesla for his part perhaps not fully understanding what Einstein believed about ether publicly dismissed his theory.  Tesla called his view, the Dynamic Theory of Gravity.  In 1937, before an interview, Tesla produced a prepared statement to the press concerning his views which mentioned a "medium" of "ether."

During the succeeding two years of intense concentration I was fortunate enough to make two far-reaching discoveries. The first was a dynamic theory of gravity, which I have worked out in all details and hope to give to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies. Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves, Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible. But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are also all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena. [italics are mine]

Tesla's second statement was just as shocking back then as it is today.

As I have searched the scientific records in more than half dozen languages for a long time without finding the least anticipation, I consider myself the original discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment.

Tesla questioned the relativity theory and even its originality with Einstein in a prepared unpublished lecture in 1936,

...the relativity theory, by the way, is much older than its present proponents. It was advanced over 200 years ago by my illustrious countryman Ruđer Bošković, the great philosopher, who, not withstanding other and multifold obligations, wrote a thousand volumes of excellent literature on a vast variety of subjects. Bošković dealt with relativity, including the so-called time-space continuum ...

Tesla also questioned the idea that the mass of an object and its speed were connected.  In a interview he made in 1931 in the The Literary Digest, it is written,

Dr. Nikola Tesla asserted in an interview with Hugo Gernsback that speeds greater than that of light, which are considered impossible by the Einstein theory of relativity, have been produced.

Stating that the Einstein theory is erroneous in many respects, Dr. Tesla stated as early as 1900, in his patent 787,412, that the current of his radio-power transmitter passed over the surface of the earth with a speed of 292,830 miles a second. According to the Einstein theory, the highest possible speed is 186,300 miles a second.

Tesla indicated knowledge of speeds several times greater than light, and had apparatus designed to project so-called electrons with a speed equal to twice that of light.

Tesla disagreed with the part of the Einstein theory which states that the mass of an object increases with its speed. The mass of a body is unalterable, contended Dr. Tesla, According to the article, "otherwise energy could be produced from nothing, since the kinetic energy acquired in the fall of a body would be greater than that necessary to lift it at a small velocity.

But truly the most spectacular statement to come from Tesla baffles even modern science.  Yet if Tesla said it, we are hard pressed to respect it as possible.  He thought like an engineer, he only believed in things which could be done.  He said in 1908, in an interview with the New York Times, titled, How the Electrician's Lamp of Aladdin May Construct New Worlds,

What I said in regard to the greatest achievement of the man of science whose mind is bent upon the mastery of the physical universe, was nothing more than what I stated in one of my unpublished addresses, from which I quote: "According to an adopted theory, every ponderable atom is differentiated from a tenuous fluid, filling all space merely by spinning motion, as a whirl of water in a calm lake. By being set in movement this fluid, the ether, becomes gross matter. Its movement arrested, the primary substance reverts to its normal state. It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear. At his command, almost without effort on his part, old worlds would vanish and new ones would spring into being. He could alter the size of this planet, control its seasons, adjust its distance from the sun, guide it on its eternal journey along any path he might choose, through the depths of the universe. He could make planets collide and produce his suns and stars, his heat and light; he could originate life in all its infinite forms. To cause at will the birth and death of matter would be man's grandest deed, which would give him the mastery of physical creation, make him fulfill his ultimate destiny.

The best explanation we have seen explaining Tesla's position on relativity and his dynamic view of gravity comes from Tom Bearden.  It is a long interview, but if one really wants to understand Tesla it is well worth the investment.  If you cannot see the embedded video, here is the link: http://youtu.be/skaDGSGE0Qc.



We include this video which makes a connection between a theory of ether and zero point energy.  If you cannot see the embedded video, here is the link: http://youtu.be/aKWPht3fU-o.


This was his greatest description of not only the ether, but also of vortexes.  This last concept shall prove very interesting to understand his influence on zero point energy and Die Glocke.  If the Bell was a zero energy device of some sort, then it would have been indeed war decisive device.

These videos first deal with some of the great inventions of Tesla which he was not given credit for and then other videos deal with over-unity machine (which according to some of the proponents are not the same as perpetual motion machines).  We are talking about zero point energy.  If you cannot see the embedded video, here is the link: http://bit.ly/oIPhF9.


In our next installment, we shall try to connect all Tesla, zero point energy and the Nazi experiments in Die Glocke together.